EFFICIENCY OF INFILTRATIVE ARTICAINE V/S NERVE BLOCK LIDOCAINE IN MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS SURGERY

Autores/as

  • Solange Baeza Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Valparaíso
  • Felipe Rojo Servicio de Salud Valparaíso San Antonio
  • Ebner Bialostocki Facultad de odontología, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.2.2414

Palabras clave:

Oral Surgery, Articaine, Lidocaine, Anesthetics, Third molar

Resumen

Objective: To compare the efficiency of infiltrative articaine versus nerve block lidocaine in pain management during mandibular third molar extraction. 

Material and methods: Randomized clinical trial. 25 patients with symmetrical semi-included third molars were analyzed, to which infiltrative Articaine and Nerve block Lidocaine were randomly applied to each demi-side. The proposed variable was the efficiency of the anesthesia protocol. Results were analyzed with a proportional comparison Z test, analyzed with a confidence level of 95%. 

Results: The infiltrative articaine efficiency was 92% for B-group, existing no statistically significant difference to Nerve block lidocaine (p<0.05).      

Conclusion: Infiltrative articaine achieves pain management comparable to that of nerve block lidocaine.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-08-31

Cómo citar

Baeza, S., Rojo, F., & Bialostocki, E. (2020). EFFICIENCY OF INFILTRATIVE ARTICAINE V/S NERVE BLOCK LIDOCAINE IN MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS SURGERY. Applied Sciences in Dentistry, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.2.2414

Número

Sección

Artículos de Investigación

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.