THE CRISIS OF THE NEOLIBERAL STATE, INEQUALITY AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY

Authors

  • Andres Solimano Centro Internacional de Globalización y Desarrollo (CIGLOB)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/pe.2023.15.4021

Keywords:

Chile, neoliberalism, economic development, the neoliberal state, deregulation, privatization, crisis, income and wealth inequality, economic democracy

Abstract

The Neoliberal economic model in Chile, imposed after the military coup of September 1973 that deposed Dr Allende’s government, led to an abrupt end of the experiment in economic redistribution and political and economic democratization initiated by
Allende. The military with the “Chicago boys” privatized public enterprises, social security and extended the market logic to education, health, and other social activities. A key piece in this capitalist restoration was the building of the neoliberal state. This article examines typologies of the State (developmentalist, welfare, minimal/neoliberal) and its relevance to understand Chilean policies, studies the main determinants of Chilean inequality, identifies the resilience of the neoliberal state despite the social resistance it engenders and explains the potential of the economic democracy approach as a less unequal and democratic alternative of economic organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andres Solimano, Centro Internacional de Globalización y Desarrollo (CIGLOB)

Fundador y Presidente de Centro Internacional de Globalización y Desarrollo (CIGLOB)

References

ARCHER, R. (1995). Economic Democracy. The Politics of Feasible Socialism. Oxford and London. Oxford University Press.

ARNESON, R. (1993). “Democratic Rights at National and Workplace Levels” in D. Copp, J. Hampton and J. E. Roemer (eds.) The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118-148.

COLE, G. D.H. (1919). Self-Government in Industry. London: C. Bell.

CUMBERS, A.R. MASTER, S. CABACO and M.J. WHITE (2019). “Reconfiguration Economic Democracy: Generating New Forms of Collective Agency, Individual Economic Freedom and Public Participation” Work, Employment and Society, pp. 1-18.

CRISTI, R. y RUIZ TAGLE, P. (2014). El constitucionalismo del miedo. Chile: Editorial LOM.

DAHL, R.A. (1985). A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press, Berkeley.

_____, (1984). “Democracy in the Workplace: Is it a Right or Privilege?”, Dissent, Vol. 31, No. 1. pp 54-60.

D’ART, D. (1992). Economic Democracy and Financial Participation; A Comparative Study. London and New York: Routledge.

ESPINOZA, J.G. and A.S. ZIMBALIST (1981). Economic Democracy: Worker’s Participation in Industrial Firms, 1970-1973. Academic Press.

FREEMAN, R.B. and KLEINER, M.M. (2000). “Who Benefits more from Employees Involvement: Firms or Workers?”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 2.

HARVEY, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

HIRSCHMAN, A. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

HUNEEUS, C. (2016). El régimen de Pinochet. Chile: Editorial Taurus.

_____, (2014). La democracia semi-soberana. Chile: Editorial Taurus.

LANE, R.E. (1985). “From Political to Industrial Democracy?”, Polity, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 623-648.

LARRAÑAGA, O. (2001). “Distribución de ingreso: 1958-2001”. En Ffrench-Davis, R; Stallings, B. (ed.), Reformas, crecimiento y políticas sociales en Chile desde 1973. Chile: Editorial LOM.

MAYER, R. (2001). “Dahl and the Right to Workplace Democracy”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 221-247.

O’DONNELL, Guillermo (1982). El Estado Burocrático Autoritario. Argentina: Editorial de Belgrano.

O’NEILL, M. (2008). “Three Rawlsian Routes to Economic Democracy”, Revue of Philosophie Economique, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 29-55.

RODRÍGUEZ WEBER, J. (2017) Desarrollo y desigualdad en Chile, 1850-2009. Historia de su Economía Politica. Chile: Dibam, Centro de Investigaciones Barros Arana.

ROTHSCHILD, J. (2000). “Creating a Just and Democratic Workplace: More Engagement, Less Hierarchy”. Contemporary Sociology, Vol.29, No. 1. pp. 195-213.

SOLIMANO, A. (2022) Economic and Political Democracy in Complex Times. History, Analysis and Policy, Routledge, London, and New York.

_____, (2021) The Rise and Fall of the Privatized Pension System in Chile. An International Perspective. Anthem Press, London & New York.

_____, (2017a) Global Capitalism in Disarray. Inequality, Debt and Stgnation. Oxford University Press.

_____, (2017b). Pensiones a la chilena. Chile: Catalonia. Santiago.

_____, (2016) “Is Inequality Really Declining in Latin America? Evidence on Income, Wealth and the Social Structure” International Center for Globalization and Development, CIGLOB Working Paper # 26.

_____, (2015). Elites económicas, crisis y el capitalismo del siglo XXI. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

_____, (2014a). “The Paradoxes of Chilean Economic Development: Growth, Inequality, deindustrialization and sustainability risks” chapter 12 in A. Hansen and U. Wethal, editors, Emerging Economies and Challenges to Sustainability, Routledge (with Marianne Schaper).

_____, (2014b). Economic Elites, Crises, and Democracy. Alternatives Beyond Neoliberal Capitalism. Oxford University Press.

_____, (2013). “Democracia Económica para Superar el Neoliberalismo” International Center for Globalization and Development, CIGLOB Working Paper # 17.

_____, (2012). Capitalismo a la Chilena. Chile: Editorial Catalonia, Santiago.

SOLIMANO, A. and G. ZAPATA-ROMAN (2024). Chilean Economic Development under Neoliberalism. Structural Change, High Inequality and Environmental Fragility. Cambridge University Press, (forthcoming).

TOCQUEVILLE, A. de (1961 [1835]). Democracy in America, 2 vols. New York: Schocken Books.

Published

2023-12-26

How to Cite

Solimano, A. (2023). THE CRISIS OF THE NEOLIBERAL STATE, INEQUALITY AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY. Economic Profiles, (15). https://doi.org/10.22370/pe.2023.15.4021

Issue

Section

Artículos: Dossier 50 años de Economía chilena entre Dictadura y Democracia