Sustainable Investment and Value Creation in Copper Mining: An Analysis from the ROSI Approach in the Chilean Mining Sector (ISVM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/riace.2026.15.1.5830Keywords:
Sustainable Investment, ROSI, ESG, Copper mining, Natural resources and energy, Value creation, Green finance, SASB, Conceptual model, ChileAbstract
Chile’s mining industry, which underpins approximately 60 % of the country’s export revenues and serves as a central axis of global copper demand for the energy transition, faces an unprecedented structural transformation. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria have shifted from a complementary reference framework to a direct determinant of capital access, social license to operate, and market valuation for mining companies. Against this backdrop, this study takes a descriptive approach to examine the evolution of sustainability reporting and profitability among Chilean companies regulated by the Financial Market Commission (CMF) with exposure to the natural resources and energy sector, and proposes the MSRE model (Sustainability and Profitability in Natural Resource and Energy Companies) as a conceptual framework—not empirically validated in this study—for analyzing the channels through which sustainable investment could create value specifically in Chilean copper mining. Because large-scale copper mining in Chile largely operates under corporate structures that do not require individual CMF securities reporting—Codelco is an unlisted state-owned company, while Escondida, Los Pelambres, and other large operations are unlisted subsidiaries of foreign parent companies—the empirical analysis draws on an expanded sample of twelve CMF-regulated natural-resource and energy companies (Reyes Murillo, 2025), rather than a copper-mining-only panel. This methodological decision is made explicit and discussed as a central limitation (Sections 3.4 and 8). Descriptive data show a sustained increase in the number of CMF companies reporting SASB sustainability indicators between 2022 and 2023, coinciding with a 4.68 percentage-point increase in average profitability. This temporal coincidence is consistent with—though it does not demonstrate—the possibility that sustainability is associated with better financial performance; the descriptive design employed does not include correlation, regression, or significance tests, and therefore cannot establish causal or statistical associations between the two variables. Building on this descriptive evidence and the ROSI framework (Eckerle et al., 2020), the study proposes the MSRE model, identifying four theoretical channels through which sustainable investment could generate value in copper mining. Only the first channel is accompanied by an illustrative quantitative estimate; the remaining three are presented as literature-grounded conceptual propositions pending direct empirical testing
Downloads
References
Agencia Internacional de Energía (AIE). (2023). Critical minerals market review 2023. International Energy Agency.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row.
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2023). Green bond market summary Q4 2023. https://www.climatebonds.net
COCHILCO. (2023). Anuario de estadísticas del cobre y otros minerales 2023. Comisión Chilena del Cobre.
Comisión Europea. (2020). Reglamento (UE) 2020/852 relativo al establecimiento de un marco para facilitar las inversiones sostenibles. https://eur-lex.europa.eu
Comisión Europea. (2023). EU Green Bond Standard. https://finance.ec.europa.eu
Comisión Europea. (2023). Reglamento de Baterías (UE) 2023/1542. https://eur-lex.europa.eu
Comisión para el Mercado Financiero (CMF). (2021). Norma de Carácter General N° 461. https://www.cmfchile.cl
Comisión para el Mercado Financiero (CMF). (2024). Norma de Carácter General N° 519. https://www.cmfchile.cl
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Eckerle, K., Whelan, T., DeNeve, B., Bhojani, S., Platko, J., & Wisniewski, R. (2020). Using the Return on Sustainability Investment (ROSI) framework to value accelerated decarbonization. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 32(2).
El-Halwagi, M. M. (2017). A return on investment metric for incorporating sustainability in process integration and improvement projects. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(2).
Gallagher, K. P., & Porzecanski, R. (2010). The dragon in the room: China and the future of Latin American industrialization. Stanford University Press.
Gleißner, W., Günther, T., & Walkshäusl, C. (2022). Financial sustainability: Measurement and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Economics, 92(3).
Handayani, A., & Rokhim, R. (2023). A comparative study of financial performance between sustainable and conventional investment. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Business, 4(2).
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Lalumière, J.-S. (2023). La inversión sostenible: ¿Una oportunidad para 'volver a construir mejor'? Review of Global Management, 6(2).
Ministerio de Hacienda de Chile. (2023). Informe de bonos sostenibles: Marco soberano. https://hacienda.cl
Onuselogu, N., & Shahzad, A. (2023). Impact of sustainable investment on the financial performance: Evidence from Pakistani banking sector. Linnaeus University.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
Reyes Murillo, E. G. (2025). Inversión sostenible y su impacto en los resultados financieros de las empresas. Artículo financiero para optar al grado de Magíster en Auditoría y Normas IFRS. Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins.
Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). The social license to operate. In P. Darling (Ed.), SME mining engineering handbook (3rd ed.). Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
USGS. (2024). Mineral commodity summaries 2024: Copper and lithium. United States Geological Survey.
Van Holt, T., Delaroche, M., Atz, U., & Eckerle, K. (2021). Financial benefits of reimagined, sustainable, agrifood supply networks. Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (CC Reconocimiento 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).



