Angiogenic and osteogenic markers in bone regeneration: a clinical case series
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

regeneración ósea alveolar
angiogénesis
osteogénesis
plasma rico en fibrina
aloinjerto óseo
inmunofluorescencia

How to Cite

Angiogenic and osteogenic markers in bone regeneration: a clinical case series. (2026). Applied Sciences in Dentistry, 7. https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2026.7..5280

Abstract

Introduction: Tooth loss leads to a series of morphological changes associated with alveolar bone resorption, which represents a limitation in rehabilitation treatments with dental implants. Various techniques and biomaterials have been developed to promote bone regeneration in this context. Angiogenesis plays an essential role in osteogenesis by facilitating the supply of nutrients and oxygen necessary for the formation of new bone tissue. This study aims to evaluate the expression of angiogenic (vWF, CD31) and osteogenic (OCN) markers in native and regenerated alveolar bone after maxillary sinus elevation with freeze-dried particulate allograft and fibrin-rich plasma (PRF). Materials and

Methods: Bone biopsies from three patients, obtained between 6 and 8 months after the regeneration procedure, were analyzed. The samples were divided into caudal (native bone) and cranial (regenerated bone) areas and processed for histological analysis by optical and confocal microscopy, with immunostaining for vWF, CD31, and OCN.

Results: Angiogenic markers were identified in both zones, with higher microvascular density in areas adjacent to graft particles. Osteocalcin showed evident expression in the regenerated bone, with the presence of osteoid tissue and reticular bone in formation, indicating osteogenic activity.

Conclusions: This pilot case series demonstrates the involvement of angiogenesis and osteogenesis in alveolar bone regeneration following sinus elevation with PRF and allograft. The findings support the biological viability of this combination and justify further studies with larger sample sizes and quantitative analysis.

PDF (Spanish)

References

1. Gaengler P. Evolution of tooth attachment in lower vertebrates to tetrapods. In: Teaford MF, Meredith Smith M, Ferguson MWJ, editors. Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 173–85.

2. Liu J, Kerns DG. Mechanisms of Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review. Open Dent J. 2014;8:56-65.

3. Kale AA, Di Cesare PE. Osteoinductive agents. Basic science and clinical applications. Am J Orthop.1995;24:752-61.

4. Wang HL, Boyapati L. “pASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006;15:8-17.

5. Bai Y, Yin G, Huang Z, Liao X, Chen X, Yao Y, et al Localized delivery of growth factors for angiogenesis and bone formation in tissue engineering. International Immunopharmacology. 2013;16:214–223.

6. Grosso A, Burger MG, Lunger A, Schaefer DJ, Banfi A, Di Maggio N. It takes two to tango: Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis for bone regeneration. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2017;5:68.

7. Adams RH, Alitalo K. Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8:464-478.

8. Riddle RC, Khatri R, Schipani E, Clemens TL. Role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in angiogenic-osteogenic coupling. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2009;87: 583–590.

9. An SY, Lee YJ, Neupane S, Jun JH, Kim JY, Lee Y, et al Effects of vascular formation during alveolar bone process morphogenesis in mice. Histochem Cell Biol. 2017;148:435-443.

10. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJJ, Mouhyi J, Gogly B. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part III: leucocyte activation—a new feature for platelet concentrates? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(3):e51–e55.

11. Kaufman E. Maxillary sinus elevation surgery: an overview. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15:272–283.

12. Parra M, Olate S, Cantín M. Clinical and biological analysis in graftless maxillary sinus lift. J Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial. Surgeons. 2017;214–20.

13. Zinser MJ, Randelzhofer P, Kuiper L, Zoller JE, De Lange GL. The predictors of implant failure after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and reconstruction: a retrospective study of 1045 consecutive implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115:571-582.

14. Ha J, Son JH, Sung IY, Cho YC, Choi JH. Clinical outcomes of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus via lateral approach. A 10 year follow up study. Journal of Dental Sciences 2020: 15;270-277.

15. Roux BM, Cheng MH, Brey EM. Engineering clinically relevant volumes of vascularized bone. J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19:903-14.

16. Hankenson KD, Dishowitz M, Gray C, Schenker M. Angiogenesis in bone regeneration. Injury. 2011;42:556-61.

17. Brandi ML, Collin-Osdoby P. Vascular biology and the skeleton. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:183–92.

18. Fernández JM. Importance of angiogenesis in the design of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.. 2020;16(3): 211-231.

19. Saghiri MA, Orangi J, Asatourian A, Sorenson CM, Sheibani N. Functional role of inorganic trace elements in angiogenesis part III: (Ti, Li,

20. Ce, As, Hg, Va, Nb and Pb). J Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2016;98:290-301.

21. Larsen M, Willems WF, Pelzer M, Friedrich PF, Dadsetan M, Bishop AT. Fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor mediated augmentation of angiogenesis and bone formation in vascularized bone allotransplants. Microsurgery. 2014;34(4):301-307.

22. Goad DL, Rubin J, Wang H, Tashjian AH, Patterson C. Enhanced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells and murine osteoblasts induced by insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinology. 1996;137:2262–2268.

23. Burger MG, Grosso A, Briquez PS, et al Robust coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by VEGF-decorated matrices for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2022;149:111-125.

24. Prieto EM, Talley AD, Gould NR, Zienkiewicz KJ, Drapeau SJ, Kalpakci KN, et al Effects of particle size and porosity on in vivo remodeling of settable allograft bone/polymer composites. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2015;12:107.

25. Yamada M, Egusa H. Current bone substitutes for implant dentistry. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:152–61.

26. Farina, R.; Trombelli, L. Wound healing of extraction sockets. Endod. Top. 2011, 25, 16–43.

27. Wang X, Fok MR, Pelekos G, Jin L, Tonetti MS. Increased local concentrations of growth factors from leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin do not translate into improved alveolar ridge preservation: an intra-individual mechanistic randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2022;49(9):889-898.

28. Elbanna RM, Abdelaziz MS, Alameldeen HE. Augmentation of single tooth extraction socket with deficient buccal walls using bovine xenograft with platelet-rich fibrin membrane. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:874.

29. Caponio VCA, Baca-González L, González-Serrano J, Torres J, López-Pintor RM. Effect of platelet concentrates on new bone formation in alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(8):4131-4148.

30. Liu M, Liu Y, Luo F. The role and mechanism of platelet-rich fibrin in alveolar bone regeneration. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Dec;168:115795.

31. Inchingolo F, Palmieri A, Cazzolla AP, Inchingolo AD, Santacroce L, Scacco S, et al Guided bone regeneration: CGF and PRF combined with various types of scaffolds—a systematic review. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2024;38(2):125-134.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Applied Sciences in Dentistry