The ideal of unification in biology: the case of extended evolutionary synthesis
Keywords:evolutionary theory, externalism/internalism, integrative approach, theoretical continuity, epistemic value
In this article I will analyze whether the so-called Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) represents a synthesis and an extension with respect to its predecessor, Modern Synthesis (MS). It will be argued that the MS proposes an externalist approach to evolution while the EES considers it necessary to overcome the internalism/externalism dichotomy by proposing more integrative approaches. It will be concluded that the EES cannot be considered an extension of MS and that the appeal to that extension is related to sociological aspects and the epistemic value of theoretical unification that was always present in biological evolutionary thinking.
Bowler, P. (1985). El eclipse del darwinismo: teorías evolucionistas antidarwinistas en las décadas en torno a 1900. Barcelona: Ed. Labor.
Darwin, C. (1859/1964). On the Origin of Species. A Facsimile of the First Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
García Azkonobieta, T. (2005). Evolución, desarrollo y (auto)organización. Un estudio sobre los principios filosóficos de la evo-devo. Tesis doctoral. Donostia-San Sebastián: Universidad del País Vasco.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1969). The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gould, S. J. (2004). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Massachusetts y Londres: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge.
Huxley, J. (1943). The Modern Synthesis. London: George Allen & Unwin L.T.D.
Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc. R. Soc. B., 282(1813). doi: http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
Lamarck, J. B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique. Paris: Dentu.
Mayr, E. (2001). The philosophical foundations of darwinism. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 145(4): 488-495.
Mayr, E., Provine W.B (1980). The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayr, E. (1998). This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Müller, G.B. (2017). Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary? Interface Focus 7: 20170015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.001
Oyama, S. (2000a). Evolution’s Eye: A Systems View of the Biology-Culture Divide. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Oyama, S. (2000b). The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Oyama, S., Grifiths, P. E., Gray, R. D. (2001). Cycles of Contingency. Developmental Systems and Evolution. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Pigliucci, M. (2007). Do We Need an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis? Evolution, 61(12): 2743-2749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x
Pigliucci, M., Müller, G. B. (2010). Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Regner, A. C. (2002). O «jogo do atual e do possível» e as manhas da razão: un estudo de caso. En F. Tula Molina y P. Lorenzano (eds.), Filosofía e historia de la ciencia en el Cono Sur. Quilmes. Argentina: Editorial UNQ.
Ruse, M. (1975). Darwin’s debt to philosophy: An examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John. W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin’s theory of Evolution. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 6(2): 159-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(75)90019-9
Smocovities, V. B. (1996). Unifying Biology. The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. R. (1977). Discussion Darwin and Whewell. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 8(4): 353-356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(77)90026-7
Whewel, W. (1837). History of the Inductive Sciences. From the Earliest to the Present Times. London: J. W. Parker.
Whewel, W. (1840). Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. Founded Upon Their History. London: J. W. Parker.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).