Keywords:Pragmatism, realism, pluralism, coherence, truth, reality
In this paper I seek to articulate and develop Roberto Torretti’s advocacy of pragmatic realism. At the core of Torrietti’s view is a rejection of the notion that the truth of scientific theories consists in their correspondence to the world. I propose to understand correspondence in that sense as a metaphorical notion. I articulate a notion of pragmatist coherence, on the basis of which I make new coherence theories of truth and reality. Then it becomes possible to say that pragmatic realism consists in the pursuit of true knowledge of reality, in a way that is also consonant with Torretti’s pluralism.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bowdle, B. F. & Gentner, D. (2005). “The career of metaphor”. Psychological Review, 112, 193-216.
Chang, H. (2012). Is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chang, H. (2014). “Epistemic activities and systems of practice: Units of analysis in philosophy of science after the practice turn”. In L. Soler, S. Zwart, M. Lynch, & V. Israel-Jost (Eds.), Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history and social studies of science (pp. 67-79). London and Abingdon: Routledge.
Chang, H. & Leonelli, S. (2005). “Infrared metaphysics: The elusive ontology of radiation (part 1)”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36, 477-508.
Durpé, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Foley, R. (1998). “Justification, epistemic”. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (vol. 5, pp. 157-165). London: Routledge.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Held, R. (1965). “Plasticity in sensory–motor systems”. Scientific American, 213 (5), 84-94.
Hesse, M. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Holton, G. (1986). “Metaphors in science and education”. In G. Holton, The advancement of science, and its burdens (pp. 229-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
James, W. (1978 ). Pragmatism and The meaning of truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kant, I. (1933 ). The critique of pure reason, 2nd ed. Trans. by N. Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, C. I. (1929). Mind and the world-order: Outline of a theory of knowledge. New York: Dover.
Lewis, C. I. (1930). [Book review] “The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action [by] John Dewey”. The Journal of Philosophy, 27, 14-25.
Mitchell, S. D. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neurath, O. (1983 [1932/33]). “Protocol Statements”. In R. S. Cohen, & M. Neurath (Eds.), Philosophical papers 1913-1946 (pp. 91-99). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Putnam, H. (1987). The many faces of realism. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Putnam, H. (1995). Pragmatism: An open question. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scheffler, I. (1999). “A Plea for Plurealism”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35, 425-436.
Torretti, R. (2000). “‘Scientific realism’ and scientific practice”. In E. Agazzi & M. Pauri (Eds.), The reality of the unobservable (pp. 113-122). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Young, J. O. (2015). “The coherence theory of truth”. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-coherence/
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).