Efficiency of infiltrative articaine v/s nerve block lidocaine in mandibular third molars surgery

Authors

  • Solange Baeza Facultad de odontología, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
  • Felipe Rojo Servicio de Salud Valparaíso San Antonio
  • Ebner Bialostocki Facultad de odontología, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.2.2414

Keywords:

Oral Surgery, Articaine, Lidocaine, Anesthetics, Third molar

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficiency of infiltrative articaine versus nerve block lidocaine in pain management during mandibular third molar extraction. 

Material and methods: Randomized clinical trial. 25 patients with symmetrical semi-included third molars were analyzed, to which infiltrative Articaine and Nerve block Lidocaine were randomly applied to each demi-side. The proposed variable was the efficiency of the anesthesia protocol. Results were analyzed with a proportional comparison Z test, analyzed with a confidence level of 95%. 

Results: The infiltrative articaine efficiency was 92% for B-group, existing no statistically significant difference to Nerve block lidocaine (p<0.05).      

Conclusion: Infiltrative articaine achieves pain management comparable to that of nerve block lidocaine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

Issue

Section

Research

How to Cite

Efficiency of infiltrative articaine v/s nerve block lidocaine in mandibular third molars surgery. (2020). Applied Sciences in Dentistry, 1(2), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.2.2414

Similar Articles

21-30 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.