Hatred and Anger: A Conceptual Analysis and Practical Effects. A tribute to Jonathan Haidt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp107-123Keywords:
emotions, hatred, anger, conceptual analysis, practical effectsAbstract
This work intends to study the status of some emotions in a practical environment. I shall focus specifically on two: anger and hatred. My first objective will be to show that the distinction between the two is not as simple as might appear at first sight. This is because, as I will show, anger and hatred appear to be neighboring emotions. It is therefore necessary to analyze them conceptually to pull aside the veils of appearance and thus identify their relevant differences. My second objective is to show that the conceptual distinction I seek is not in pursuit of a merely analytical interest. I shall claim that the conceptual differences here have a practical impact, especially in the political environment, because anger and hatred should be dealt with differently in the realm of democracies.
References
Acorn, A. (2018). A favor del enojo. México: Letras libres.
Aristotle (2018). Rhetoric. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Benente, M. (2015). Criminalización y regulación de la protesta social. El fracaso de la teoría de la democracia deliberativa. Lecciones y Ensayos, 95, 19-44. URL: http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/95/criminalizacion-y-regulacion-de-la-protesta-social.pdf
Butler, J. (2017). Cuerpos aliados y lucha política. Hacia una teoría performativa de la asamblea. Barcelona: Paidós.
Cortina, A. (2017). Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre: un desafío para la democracia. Barcelona: Paidós.
Cueva Fernández, R. (2012). El «discurso del odio» y su prohibición. Doxa, 35, 437-455.
Damasio, A. (2013). El error de Descartes. La emoción, la razón y el cerebro humano. Barcelona: Editorial Destino.
Doris, J. (2010). The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elster, J. (2013). Alquimias de la mente: la racionalidad y las emociones. Barcelona: Paidós.
Emcke, C. (2019). Contra el odio. Barcelona: Taurus.
Farah, M. (2010). Neuroethics. An introduction with readings. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gargarella, R. (2008). Un diálogo sobre la ley y la protesta social. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho. 61, 19-50. http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3177/2995
Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings: A theory of normative judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
González Lagier, D. (2017). A la sombra de Hume: un balance crítico del intento de la neuroética de fundamentar la moral. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Greene, J. (2014). Moral Tribes. Emotion, reason and the gap between us and them. New York: Penguin Books.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological review, 108(4), 814-834.
Haidt, J. (2019). La mente de los justos. Porqué la política y la religión dividen a la gente sensata. País Vasco: Deusto.
Kolnai, A. (2013). Asco, soberbia, odio. Fenomenología de los sentimientos hostiles. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro.
Magnus, A. (2015). Oda al odio. Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo editor.
Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (1999). Concepts: core readings. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Migallón Granados, S and Giménez Amaya, J. (2009). Neuroética. Philosophica. Enciclopedia filosófica online. http://www.philosophica.info/voces/neuroetica/Neuroetica.html
Montaigne, M. (2002). De la colère. In Montaigne, M., Les essais, pp. 522-526. Paris: Arléa.
Nussbaum, M. (2018). La ira y el perdón. Resentimiento, generosidad, justicia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Nussbaum, M. (2019). La monarquía del miedo. Una mirada filosófica a la crisis política actual. Barcelona: Paidós.
Ortiz-Millán, G. (2004). Los enemigos y los efectos racionales del odio. Variaciones sobre temas de Plutarco. Diánoia, 49(53), 33-56.
Peralta, J.M. (2013) Homicidio por odio como delitos de sometimiento. InDret, 4, 1-27. http://www.indret.com/pdf/1005.pdf
Sloterdijk, P. (2017). Ira y tiempo. Ensayo psicopolítico. Madrid: Siruela.
Ferran, Í. V. (2009). Teorías analíticas de las emociones: el debate actual y sus precedentes históricos. Contrastes: revista internacional de filosofía, 14, 217-240.
Vidiella, G. (2018). ¿ Qué le aporta la neuroética a la ética? Revista latinoamericana de filosofía, 44(1), 103-117.
Yuan, M. S. (2021). Ver-como y epistemología hinge. Filosofia Unisinos/Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 22(1), 29-37.
Yuan, M. S. (2022). Sobre la noción de ‘interpretación’ en el ‘ver-como’ de Wittgenstein. Ideas y Valores (en prensa).
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-06-15 (3)
- 2022-06-10 (2)
- 2022-05-30 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
