What Philosophies Has Neuroscience Affected?


  • Jordi Vallverdu Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona




philosophy, neuroscience, philosophical anthropology, cognition


It seems obvious to think that neuroscientific advances, a revolution at the end of the 20th century, have had an impact on Contemporary Philosophy. However, this is not the case. As a discipline composed of numerous areas, it is still anchored in anthropological, cultural, epistemological and cognitive models of previous centuries (and even millennia). We will review what the real impact of neurosciences has been on contemporary thought, from a critical perspective and oriented not only to the study of the human being, but also of AI.


Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. In Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3

Chemero, Anthony (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Churchland, Paul Montgomery (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: the nature of mind and the structure of science. MIT Press.

Churchland, Patricia Smith (1987). Epistemology in the Age of Neuroscience. Journal of Philosophy, Inc., 84(10), 544-553.

Churchland, Patricia Smith (2008). The Impact of Neuroscience on Philosophy. Neuron, 60(3), 409-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEURON.2008.10.023

Clark, Andy (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00096

Clausen, J., Levy, N. (2015). Handbook of neuroethics. In Handbook of Neuroethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4

Damasio, Antonio R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

Damasio, Antonio R. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Nature, 401(6756). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.51.12.1579

Froese, T., Ziemke, T. (2009). Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence, 173(3-4), 466-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTINT.2008.12.001

Giere, R.N., Bickle, J., Mauldin, R. F. (2005). Understanding Scientific Reasoning. Cengage Learning.

Giere, Ronald N. (1988). Explaining science: a cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Haas, J. (2022). Reinforcement learning: A brief guide for philosophers of mind. Philosophy Compass, 17(9), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/PHC3.12865

Kahneman, Daniel. (2011). Thinking fast, thinking slow. Londres: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Lauer, D. (2021). Facebook’s ethical failures are not accidental, they are part of the business model. AI and Ethics, 1(4), 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43681-021-00068-X

Legrenzi, P., Umilta, C., & Anderson, F. (2011). Neuromania: On the limits of brain science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591343.001.0001

Levinson, S. C. (2012). The Original Sin of Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(3), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1756-8765.2012.01195.X

Maiese, M. (2018). Can the mind be embodied, enactive, affective, and extended?. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17, 343-361 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9510-6

Musk, E., & Neuralink. (2019). An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels. J. Med. Internet Res., 21(10), E16194. https://Www.Jmir.Org/2019/10/E16194, 21(10), e16194. https://doi.org/10.2196/16194

De Brigard, F., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Eds.) (2022). Neuroscience and Philosophy. Cambridge: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12611.001.0001

Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Rees, T. (2019). Why tech companies need to hire philosophers — Quartz. https://qz.com/1734381/why-tech-companies-need-to-hire-philosophers/

Ren, F. (2019). Influence of Cognitive Neuroscience on Contemporary Philosophy of Science. Translational Neuroscience, 10(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/TNSCI-2019-0007

Thaler, R. H. (2000). From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 133-141.

Vallverdú, J. (2016). Debate e ideas sobre “neuro-” algo. Folia Humanística, 2, 56-65.

Vallverdú, J. (2018). Re-embodying cognition with the same “biases”? International Journal of Engineering and Future Technology, 15(1), 23-30.

Vallverdú, J., Müller, V. C. (2019). Blended cognition: the robotic challenge. Dordrecht: Springer.

Wallace, B. A. (2007). Contemplative science: where Buddhism and neuroscience converge. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.



2022-12-01 — Updated on 2022-12-02

How to Cite

Vallverdu, J. (2022). What Philosophies Has Neuroscience Affected?. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (20), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp47-55



Monographic Section