Dual Process Theory and Metamorality in Greene
A Critical Reading from Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2025iss28.4348Keywords:
Cognitive control, moral judgment, moral dilemmas, utilitarianism, deontologyAbstract
Two fundamental aspects of the philosophical proposal developed by Joshua Greene in his work 'Moral tribes' are the role of cognitive control in dual process theory and its application to solving moral problems on a global scale, which he calls metamorality. Based on his theory, Greene proposes a strategy to address moral conflicts both intra and intergroup. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the role of cognitive control in dual process theory, as well as the metamorality proposed by Greene.
Downloads
References
BRAND, C. (2016). Dual-process theories in moral psychology. Tübingen: Springer.
BRAKEL, L. A. W., & SHEVRIN, H. (2003). Freud’s dual process theory and the place of the a-rational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 527-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03210116
CIARAMELLI, E., MUCCIOLI, M., LÀDAVAS, E., & DI PELLEGRINO, G. (2007). Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2(2), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm001
DAMASIO, A. (2000). A neural basis for sociopathy. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 57(2), 128-129. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.57.2.128
DEMAREE-COTTON, J., & KAHANE, G. (2018). The Neuroscience of Moral Judgment. En A. Zimmerman, K. Jones, & M. Timmons (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Moral Epistemology (1.a ed., pp. 84-104). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719696-5
ETKIN, A., EGNER, T., & KALISCH, R. (2011). Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004
EVANS, J., & FRANKISH, K. (Eds.). (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (1.a ed.). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.001.0001
EVANS, J. ST. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
FOOT, P. (1967) The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5-15.
GREENE, J.D.; SOMMERVILLE, R.B.; NYSTROM, L.E.; DARLEY, J.M. Y COHEN, J.D. (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108 Testing materials (dilemmas) are available from Science Online at http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2001/09/13/293.5537.2105.DC1
GREENE, J.D.; NYSTROM, L.E.; ENGELL, A.D.; DARLEY, J.M. Y COHEN, J.D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389-400.
GREENE, J.D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant's soul, En W. Sinnott-Armstrong, (Ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development (pp. 35-79). Cambridge: MIT Press.
GREENE, J. D. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. The Penguin Press.
GÜRÇAY, B., & BARON, J. (2017). Challenges for the sequential two-system model of moral judgement. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(1), 49-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1216011
HATUKAI, T., & ALGOM, D. (2017). The Stroop incongruity effect: Congruity relationship reaches beyond the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(6), 1098-1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000381
JAMES, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology: American Science Series-Advanced Course. In Two Volumes. Henry Holt and Comp.
KAHANE, G. (2012). On the Wrong Track: Process and Content in Moral Psychology. Mind & Language, 27(5), 519-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12001
KAHNEMAN, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (1st ed). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
KAMM, F.M. The Trolley Problem Mysteries, ed. Eric Rakowski. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
KLEIN, C. (2011). The Dual Track Theory of Moral Decision-Making: A Critique of the Neuroimaging Evidence. Neuroethics, 4(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-9077-1
KOENIGS, M., YOUNG, L., ADOLPHS, R., TRANEL, D., CUSHMAN, F., HAUSER, M., & DAMASIO, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. NATURE, 446(7138), 908-911. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05631
MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
MALLE, B. F. (2021). Moral judgments. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 293-318.
NEJATI, V., MAJDI, R., SALEHINEJAD, M. A., & NITSCHE, M. A. (2021). The role of dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in the processing of emotional dimensions. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81454-7
ROSAS, A., ARCINIEGAS, A., CAVIDES, E., & ARCINIEGAS, A. (2014). LA NEUROPSICOLOGÍA DEL JUICIO MORAL. SOBRE LAS CAUSAS DE RESPUESTAS CONTRAINTUITIVAS A LOS DILEMAS MORALES. Praxis Filosófica, 38, 89-106. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i38.3526
ROSAS, A., BERMÚDEZ, J. P., & AGUILAR-PARDO, D. (2019). Decision conflict drives reaction times and utilitarian responses in sacrificial dilemmas. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(5), 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1017/S193029750000485X
SAUER, H. (2012). Morally irrelevant factors: What’s left of the dual process-model of moral cognition? Philosophical Psychology, 25(6), 783-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.631997
STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology, 18(6), 643.
STROOP, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(1), 15.
THOMSON, J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale law journal 94(6): 1 395-1415.
YOUNG, L., KOENIGS, M., KRUEPKE, M., & NEWMAN, J. P. (2012). Psychopathy increases perceived moral permissibility of accidents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(3), 659-667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027489
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
