La selección genética preimplantacional frente a la crítica del modelo social de la discapacidad

Pablo Marshall

doi:10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp133-149

Autores/as

Pablo Marshall Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp133-149

Palabras clave:

discapacidad, selección genética, autonomía reproductiva, modelo social de la discapacidad

Resumen

El presente artículo analiza los principales argumentos ofrecidos por la literatura en relación con la pregunta si debe permitirse la diagnostico y selección genética preimplantacional en el contexto de técnicas de reproducción asistida con miras a evitar la presencia de una discapacidad. Las principales posiciones en el debate bioético se enfrentan a un desafío adicional cuando se consideran las críticas provenientes del discurso sobre la discapacidad. De este modo, cuando la dimensión social opresiva de la discapacidad es tomada en cuenta, ella resulta en una serie de cuestionamientos que podrían poner en entredicho las conclusiones más decantadas del debate bioético. Sin embargo, el modelo social no ha estado exento de críticas y una de ellas, la minusvaloración de la importancia de características de origen biológico frente a una discapacidad de origen social, resuena particularmente en el debate sobre selección genética preimplantacional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Asch, A. (2019). 40. Disability Equality and Prenatal Testing Contradictory or Compatible? En O. K. Obasogie & M. Darnovsky (Eds.), Beyond Bioethics, pp. 361-375. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520961944-045

Barker, M. J., Wilson, R. A. (2019). Well-being, Disability, and Choosing Children. Mind, 128(510), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy039

Barnes, C., Mercer, G., Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Polity Press; 43b.

Barnes, E. (2016). The minority body: A theory of disability. Oxford University Press.

Bayefsky, M., & Jennings, B. (2015). Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in the United States. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137515445

Beauchamp, T. L., Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.

Becerra, C. (2015). Selecting for disability. http://eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/encyclopedia/55542acc35ae9d9e7f000063

Birko, S., Lemoine, M-E., Nguyen, M.T., Ravitsky, V. (2018) Moving Towards Routine Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Challenges Related to Women’s Autonomy. OBM Genetics, 2(2): 018. https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.genet.1802018

Boardman, F. K. (2014). The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: The experiences of families living with genetic disease. Social science & medicine, 107, 18-25.

Boyle, R. J., Savulescu, J. (2001). Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person. Bmj, 323(7323), 1240-1243.

Buchanan, A. E. (Ed.). (2000). From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, S., Savulescu, J., Coady, C. A. J., Giubilini, A., Sanyal, S. (2016). The Ethics of Human Enhancement. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.001.0001

DeVidi, D., Klausen, C. (2017). No Mere Difference. Dialogue, 56(2), 357-379. https://doi.org/10/gf5n24

Dworkin, R. (2002). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Harvard university press.

Elliston, S. (2012). The welfare of the child principle and the use of PGD: Selecting for disability. En Regulating Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (pp. 103-139). Routledge

El-Toukhy, T., & Braude, P. (2013). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. (2004). Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility, 82, S245

Garland-Thomson, R. (2012). The Case for Conserving Disability. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9(3), 339-355. https://doi.org/10/gf5n3c

Glover, J. (2006). Choosing children: Genes, disability, and design. OUP Oxford.

Goering, S. (2014). Eugenics. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/eugenics/

Gyngell, C., Douglas, T. (2018). Selecting Against Disability: The Liberal Eugenic Challenge and the Argument from Cognitive Diversity. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35(2), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12199

Habermas, J. (2014). The future of human nature. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hall, M. C. (2013). Reconciling the disability critique and reproductive liberty: The case of negative genetic selection. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 6(1), 121-143.

Hampton, S. J. (2005). Family eugenics. Disability & Society, 20(5), 553-561. https://doi.org/10/cb8q6k

Karnein, A. J. (2012). A theory of unborn life: From abortion to genetic manipulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Klein, D. A. (2011). Medical Disparagement of the Disability Experience: Empirical Evidence for the “Expressivist Objection”. AJOB Primary Research, 2(2), 8-20. https://doi.org/10/c286mh

Krahn, T. M. (2011). Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis: The case of down’s syndrome. Medical Law Review, 19(2), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwr009

Madeo, A. C., Biesecker, B. B., Brasington, C., Erby, L. H., Peters, K. F. (2011). The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: A commentary. American journal of medical genetics Part A, 155(8), 1777-1785.

McGee, A. (2020). Using the therapy and enhancement distinction in law and policy. Bioethics, 34(1), 70-80. https://doi.org/10/gncz2t

McMahan, J. (2005). Causing Disabled People to Exist and Causing People to Be Disabled. Ethics, 116(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1086/454367

Nelson, J. L. (1998). The meaning of the act: Reflections on the expressive force of reproductive decision making and policies. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 8(2), 165-182.

Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10/b5g256

Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. OUP Oxford.

Robertson, J. A. (1994). Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton University Press.

Rubeis, G., Steger, F. (2019). A burden from birth? Non-invasive prenatal testing and the stigmatization of people with disabilities. Bioethics, 33(1), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12518

Salas, S. P. (s. f.). Aspectos éticos, legales, y sociales del diagnóstico genértico pre-implantacional. En Bioética y Salud Pública en y para Ámerica Latina, p. 166. Santiago: FELAIBE.

Sandel, M. J. (2009). The case against perfection. Harvard University Press.

Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children. Bioethics, 15(5-6), 413-426. https://doi.org/10/fczfn2

Savulescu, J. (2007). In defence of Procreative Beneficence. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(5), 284-288. https://doi.org/10/dvz285

Savulescu, J., Bostrom, N. (2009). Human enhancement. OUP Oxford.

Savulescu, J., Dahl, E. (2000). Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis: A response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Human Reproduction, 15(9), 1879-1880.

Scott, R. (2007). Choosing between possible lives: Law and ethics of prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Oxford: Hart.

Shakespeare, T. (1999). ‘Losing the plot’? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(5), 669-688.

Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.

Shakespeare, T. (2011). Choices, reasons and feelings: Prenatal diagnosis as disability dilemma. Alter, 5(1), 37-43. x. https://doi.org/10/ct8p5v

Sparrow, R. (2010). Better than men? Sex and the therapy/enhancement distinction. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20(2), 115-144. https://doi.org/10/csdpkw

Taylor-Sands, M. (2013). Saviour siblings: A relational approach to the welfare of the child in selective reproduction. London: Routledge.

Wilkinson, S. (2010). Choosing tomorrow’s children: The ethics of selective reproduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Wolf, S. M., Kahn, J. P., Wagner, J. E. (2003). Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to create a stem cell donor: Issues, guidelines & limits. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(3), 327-339.