¿Pueden las intuiciones justificar las afirmaciones morales?

Autores/as

  • Alison M Jaggar University of Colorado Boulder
  • Theresa W. Tobin Marquette University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss24pp105-123

Palabras clave:

intuición, justificación moral, epistemología moral, injusticia epistémica

Resumen

En las tres últimas décadas del siglo XX, muchos filósofos analíticos han abordado cuestiones de ética práctica, ampliando radicalmente el campo de la filosofía moral más allá de los temas metaéticos que habían sido su foco principal durante la mayor parte del siglo. Sin embargo, abordar este tipo de controversias prácticas rápidamente hizo surgir la cuestión de cómo justificar las afirmaciones morales normativas. Muchos filósofos analíticos se basaron en el intuicionismo, que tiene un linaje muy antiguo dentro de la filosofía moral anglófona. Este artículo evalúa tres formas en las que los filósofos analíticos del siglo XX recurrieron a las intuiciones para apoyar o rebatir las afirmaciones morales. Argumentamos que esos métodos fracasaron en su objetivo de promover un conocimiento moral digno de confianza porque se basaron en supuestos que, cuando se presumen en contextos de injusticia epistémica estructural, son sistemáticamente engañosos. A pesar de que las intuiciones se encuentran entre las fuentes de conocimiento en las que los agentes morales deben confiar, la epistemología moral debe prestar especial atención a los procesos sociales a través de los cuales se recogen, refinan y evalúan las intuiciones y otras formas de evidencia. Producir un conocimiento moral digno de confianza requiere procesos de razonamiento democráticos que sean sensibles a la omnipresencia de la injusticia epistémica y la dominación, así como desarrollar estrategias para contrarrestarlas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adelberg, T., Thompson, M., & Nahmias, E. (2014). Do Men and Women Have Different Philosophical Intuitions? Further Data. Philosophical Psychology, 28(5), 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.878834

Anderson, E. (1993). Value in Ethics and Economics. Harvard University Press.

Anderson, E. (2012) Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 26(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211

Anderson, E. (2014). Social Movements, Experiments in Living, and Moral Progress: Case Studies from Britain’s Abolition of Slavery. University of Kansas.

Anderson, E. (2015). Moral Bias and Corrective Practices: A Pragmatist Perspective. Central APA Presidential Address, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 89, 21-53.

Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. In M. R. Depaul, & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophy Inquiry (pp. 201-239). Rowman and Littlefield.

Brandt, R. (1954). Hopi Ethics: A Theoretical Analysis. University of Chicago Press.

Brison, S. J. (2002). Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self. Princeton University Press.

Bordonaba-Plou, D., Fernández-Castro, V., & Torices, J. R. (2022). Analytic philosophy as philosophical activism. In D. Bordonaba-Plou, V. Fernández-Castro, & J. R. Torices (Eds.), The Political Turn in Analytic Philosophy: Reflections on Social Injustice and Oppression (pp. 3-29). De Gruyter.

Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2014). Gender and Philosophical Intuition. In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 307-346). Oxford University Press.

Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford University Press.

Chudnoff, E. (2013). Intuition. Oxford University Press.

Dewey, J., & Tufts, J. (1981). Ethics. Ed. J. A. Boydston, The Later Works, 1925–1953. Southern Illinois University Press.

Edmonds, D. (2014). Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong. Princeton University Press.

Foot, P. (1967). The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5-15.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.

Gilligan, C. (1981-1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University

Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Philosophical Program of Justification. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Trans. Christian Lenhardt and Sherry Weber Nicholsen. The MIT Press.

Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail. Psychological Review, 108(4), 813-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Hales, S. D. (2006). Relativism and the foundations of philosophy. The MIT Press.

Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds. Harper Collins.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Horvath, J. (2010). How (Not) to React to Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Psychology, 23, 447-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.505878

Jaggar, A. M. (1989). Love & Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 32(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748908602185

Jaggar, A. M., & Tobin, T. W. (2013). Situating Moral Justification: Rethinking the Mission of Moral Epistemology. Metaphilosophy, 4(4), 383-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12048

Jaggar, A. M. (2019). Thinking about Justice in the Unjust Meantime. Feminist Philosophical Quarterly, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7283

Jaggar, A. M., & Tobin, T. W. (2024). Moral justification and structural epistemic injustice. In J. Browne & M. McKeown (Eds.), What is Structural Injustice? Oxford University Press.

Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking Fast and Slow. Penguin.

Keynes, J. M. (1949). Two memoirs: Dr Melchior: a defeated enemy and My early beliefs. Augusts M. Kelley.

Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Ladd, J. (1957). The Structure of a Moral Code: A Philosophical Analysis of Ethical Discourse applied to the Ethics of the Navaho Indians. Harvard University Press.

Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.

McCumber, J. (2001). Time in th Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Northwestern University Press.

Mikhail, J. (2011). Elements of Moral Cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Mill, J. S. (1977). On Liberty. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Collected Works of J. S. Mill (Vol. 18, pp. 260-267). University of Toronto Press.

Norcross, A. (2004). Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases. Ethics, 18(1), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00027.x

Nozick, R. (1989). The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations. Simon and Schuster.

Pinedo, M., & Villanueva, N. (2022). Epistemic de-platforming. In D. Bordonaba-Plou, V. Fernández-Castro, & J. R. Torices (Eds.), The Political Turn in Analytic Philosophy: Reflections on Social Injustice and Oppression (pp. 105-134). De Gruyter.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press.

Ross, W. D. (1930/2002). The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press.

Schwitzgebel, E., Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers. Mind and Language, 27(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01438.x

Schwitzgebel, E., Kofi Bright, L., Dicey Jennings, C., Thompson, M., & Winsberg, E. (2021). The Diversity of Philosophy Students and Faculty in the United States. The Philosophers’ Magazine, 30. https://www.philosophersmag.com/essays/244-the-diversity-of-philosophy-students-and-faculty-in-the-united-states

Sidgwick, H. (1907/1962). The Methods of Ethics. Macmillan.

Singer, P. (1972). Moral Experts. Analysis, 32(4), 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/32.4.115

Singer, P. (2005). Ethics and Intuitions. Journal of Ethics, 9(3/4), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-3508-y

Stich, S., & Tobia, K. (2016). Experimental Philosophy and the Philosophical Tradition. In J. Sytsma & W. Buckwalter (Eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy (pp, 3-21). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Thomson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265091

Tobin, T. W. (2011). The Relevance of Trust for Moral Justification. Social Theory and Practice, 37(4), 599-628. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201137435

Tobin, T. W., & Jaggar, A. M. (2013). Naturalizing Moral Justification: Rethinking the Method of Moral Epistemology. Metaphilosophy, 4(4), 409-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12050

Walker, M. U. (2007). Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics, 2/e. Oxford University Press.

Weinberg, J. M., Gonnerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters? Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.490944

Williamson, T (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Blackwell

Wisor, S. (2011). Against shallow ponds: an argument against Singer’s approach to global poverty. Journal of Global Ethics, 7(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2010.548819

Wylie, A. (2003). Why Standpoint Matters. In R. Figueroa & S. G. Harding ( Eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology (pp. 26-48). Routledge.

Zhang, L., Reynolds Losin, E. A., Ashar, Y. K., Koban, L., & Wager, T. D. (2021). Gender Biases in Estimation of Others’ Pain. The Journal of Pain, 22(9), 1048-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.001

Descargas

Publicado

2024-02-29

Cómo citar

Jaggar, A. M., & Tobin, T. W. (2024). ¿Pueden las intuiciones justificar las afirmaciones morales?. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (24), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss24pp105-123