Restando sufrimiento: un enfoque anti-agregacionista del sufrimiento en la naturaleza

Autores/as

  • Alejandro Villamor IES de Sar (Santiago de Compostela, España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss26pp243-267

Palabras clave:

Aggregationism, Anti-Aggregationism, Animal Ethics, Animal Suffering, Interventionism

Resumen

En los últimos años, cada vez es mayor el número de personas que creen en una prevalencia del sufrimiento sobre el bienestar en la naturaleza. Esta creencia suele coincidir con una axiología sensocentrista según la cual lo moralmente relevante son los estados mentales de placer y dolor. Esta combinación conduce al diagnóstico de que la prevalencia del sufrimiento tiene una enorme relevancia moral. Este artículo rechaza esta línea de pensamiento tradicional y argumenta, en su lugar, que podría no ser coherente. La afirmación de que existe una prevalencia ontológica, en abstracto, del sufrimiento en la naturaleza no es problemática. Sin embargo, no sucede lo mismo al respecto de su relevancia moral. Un sensocentrista no puede considerar que un cálculo agregacionista sea moralmente valioso, estrictamente hablando, pues no hay sujeto que lo sienta. No obstante, podría mantenerse la necesidad de una intervención positiva en la naturaleza con el objetivo de reducir el sufrimiento existente.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Altman, A. (2016). Discrimination. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/discrimination/ (Consulted June 30, 2023).

Benatar, D. (2006). Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1995). River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life. New York: Basic Books.

Faria, C., & Paez, E. (2014). Anthropocentrism and Speciesism: Conceptual and Normative Issues. Revista de Bioética y Derecho, 32, 95-103.

Faria, C. (2016). Animal Ethics Goes Wild: The Problem of Wild Animal Suffering and Intervention in Nature. Doctoral Dissertation, Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

Glover, J., & Scott-Taggart, M. J. (1975). It Makes no Difference Whether or Not I Do It. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 49, 171-209.

Hardin. R. (2008). Utilitarian Aggregation. Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation, 26, 30-47.

Hirose, I. (2013). Aggregation and the Separateness of Persons. Utilitas, 25, 182-205.

Hirose, I. (2015). Moral Aggregation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Horta, O. (2010a). Debunking the Idyllic View of Natural Processes: Population Dynamics and Suffering in the Wild. Télos, 17(1), 73–88.

Horta, O. (2010b). Disvalue in Nature and Intervention: The Fox, the Rabbit and the Vegan Food Rations. Pensata Animal, 34.

Horta, O. (2010c). What is Speciesism? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23, 243-266.

Horta, O. (2015). The Problem of Evil in Nature: Evolutionary Bases of the Prevalence of Disvalue. Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism, 3(1), 17-32.

Horta, O. (2017). Animal Suffering in Nature: The Case for Intervention. Environmental Ethics, 39, 261-279.

Horta, O. (2018). Moral Considerability and the Argument from Relevance. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(3), 369-388.

Kamm, F. M. (1998). Are There Irrelevant Utilities? In Morality, Mortality, Vol. I: Death and Whom to Save from It, New York: Oxford University Press, 144-164.

Knutsson, S. (2017). How Could an Empty World Be Better than a Populated One? Foundational Research Institute, https://foundational-research.org/how-could-an-empty-world-be-better-than-a-populated/. (Consulted June 30, 2023).

McMahan, J. (1996). Cognitive Disability, Misfortune, and Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 25, 3-35.

McMahan, J. (2002). The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mill, J. S. (2003). Utilitarianism and On Liberty. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Ng, Y.-K. (1995). Towards Welfare Biology: Evolutionary Economics of Animal Consciousness and Suffering. Biology and Philosophy, 10(3), 255-285.

Norcross, A. (1997). Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26, 135-167.

Norcross, A. (2009). Two dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights, and the Separateness of Persons. Social Philosophy and Policy, 26(1), 76-95.

Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

Parfit, D. (1978). Innumerate Ethics. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7(4), 285-301.

Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. New York: Clarendon Press.

Parfit, D. (2003). Justifiability to Each Person. Ratio, 16, 368-390.

Pluhar, E. (1996). Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals. Durham: Duke University Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rolston III, H. (1992). Disvalues in Nature. The Monist, 75(2), 250-278.

Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Sidgwick, H. (1981). The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis / Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

Singer, P. (1990). Animal Liberation. New York: Random House.

Taurek, J. M. (1977). Should the Numbers Count? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6, 293-316.

Temkin, L. S. (2005). A “New” Principle of Aggregation. Philosophical Issues, 15, 218-234.

Temkin, L. S. (2008). Aggregation within Lives. Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation, 26, 1-29.

Temkin, L. S. (2012). Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tomasik, B. (2014). How Many Wild Animals Are There? Essays on Reducing Suffering, http://reducing-suffering.org/how-many-wild-animals-are-there/. (Consulted June 30, 2023).

Tomasik, B. (2015). The Importance of Wild-Animal Suffering. Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 3, 133-152.

Tomasik, B. (2016). The Importance of Insect Suffering. Essays on Reducing Suffering, https://reducing-suffering.org/the-importance-of-insect-suffering/. (Consulted June 30, 2023).

Vallentyne, P. (2005). Of Mice and Men: Equality and Animals. The Journal of Ethics, 9, 403-433.

Villamor, A. (2018). The Overwhelming Prevalence of Suffering in Nature. Revista de Bioética y Derecho, 42, 181-195.

Višak, T. (2013). Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics. Basignstone: Palgrave MacMillan.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-09-24

Cómo citar

Villamor, A. (2024). Restando sufrimiento: un enfoque anti-agregacionista del sufrimiento en la naturaleza. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (26), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss26pp243-267

Número

Sección

Artículos-Miscelánea