Critical Physical Education: A fundamental approach to gender equality and educational inclusion in Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/ieya.2020.6.2.1374Keywords:
Physical Education, neoliberalism, critical pedagogy, school curriculum, social justiceAbstract
Currently, different debates and discussions are taking place around social justice and the relevance of a critical perspective on education that contributes to the emancipation of students. Or in other words, to its possibilities to understand the ideologies that are behind the different hegemonic brands or senses in society, such as, for example, capitalism and patriarchy in Physical Education. In this sense, the objective of this article is to analyze the phenomenon of gender equality and educational inclusion in the subject, with emphasis on the situation in Chile. Thus, the mechanistic approach of the curriculum stands out as a barrier to social transformation, the passivity of teachers facing the problem and men as the main reproducers of that patriarchal culture. Finally, it is considered that the teaching staff must be rigorously trained in the subject and that they must differentiate the contents of the subject according to the social stereotypes that are associated.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
Mujica Johnson, F. N. (2020) “Critical Physical Education: A fundamental approach to gender equality and educational inclusion in Chile”, Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje, 6(2), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.22370/ieya.2020.6.2.1374.
Issue
Section
Research articles
License
Los investigadores(as), académicos(as) y profesionales de la educación que envíen originales para su evaluación por IEYA deberán asegurarse que los artículos cumplen con las instrucciones a los autores(as).
La Revista IEYA y cada uno de sus artículos están licenciados por Creative Commons 3.0.
El proceso editorial completa no supone ningún costo económico para los autores(as).
La Revista IEYA proporcionará un DOI a cada artículo.
Por último mencionar que en pos de la transparencia del proceso de revisión doble ciego, cada autor(a) recibirá la evaluación realizada por los revisores externos, lógicamente sin conocer la persona(as) que han realizado dicha evaluación.