Hegel and the Twofold Transformation of the Concept of Reality in the Background of Kant’s Critics to the Inbegriff aller Realität
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp101-116Keywords:
doctrine of being, Hegel, system of pure reason, negation, contradiction, science of logicAbstract
In the context of a dialogue between Kant and Hegel, this paper aims at presenting some aspects of the reception that Hegel made in the Logic of Being on the so-called notion of Inbegriff aller Realität. It is a notion that Hegel retrieves and examines dialectically and speculatively, not just in a way of an exposition. The paper seeks to identify and explain the main connections of the moments in which Hegel, in the field of the development of a pure logic, first turns the reality into negation and then into contradiction.
References
De Boer, Karin (2010). Hegel’s account of contradiction in the science of logic reconsidered. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(3): 345-373.
Fink, Eugen (1959). Alles und nichts. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1978). Wissenschaft der Logik Bd. 1. Die objektive Logik (1812/1813). Hamburg: Meiner.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1986a). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1986b). Jenaer Schriften 1801-1807. Frankfurt am Main: Suhr-kamp.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1986c). Nürnberger und Heidelberger Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1986d). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie III. Frank-furt am Main: Suhrkamp
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1986e). Wissenschaft der Logik I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1986f). Wissenschaft der Logik II. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hübener, Wolfgang (1975). Zu Spinozas Satz “Omnis determinado est negatio”. En H. Weinrich (ed.) Positionen der Negativität, pp. 499-503. München: Fink.
Jaeschke, Walter (2016). Hegel-Handbuch. Berlin; Heidelberg: J. B. Metzler. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05429-6
Jaeschke, Walter, Arndt, Andreas (2012). Die klassische Deutsche Philosopie nach Kant. System der reinen Vernunft und ihre Kritik 1785-1845. München: Beck.
Kant, Immanuel (1902). Vorkritische Schriften I. 1747-1756. Berlin: Georg Reimer
Kant, Immanuel (1911). Prolegomena [1783]. En W. Dilthey (Ed.), Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, pp. 253-464. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
Kant, Immanuel (1926). Metaphysik, 1. Teil. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kant, Immanuel (1972). Vorlesungen über Metaphysik und Rationaltheologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kant, Immanuel (1990). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Meiner.
Kemp Smith, Norman (1962). A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Humani-ties Press.
Neumann, Hardy (2017). De Spinoza a Hegel. Una rehabilitación productiva de la negación. Revista de filosofía, 73: 179-192.
Nuzzo, Angelica (2014). Dialektisch-spekulative Logik und Transzendentalphilosophie. En A. F. Koch, F. Schick, K. Vieweg (Eds.), Hegel - 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik, pp. 257-273. Hamburg: Meiner. https://dx.doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2719-5.
Sedgwick, Sally (2012). Hegel’s Critique of Kant. From Dichotomy to Identity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sgarbi, Marco (2011). The Historical Genesis of the Kantian Concept of »Transcendental«. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 53: 97-117.
Spinoza, Benito (1987). Ética demostrada según el orden geométrico. Madrid: Alianza.
Spinoza, Benito (1988). Correspondencia. Madrid: Alianza.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Humanities Journal of Valparaíso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
