The Dialogical Presence of Suhrawardī and Deontic Modalities in and beyond Islamic Thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss25pp149-191Keywords:
heteronomous imperatives, deontic logic, dialogical logic, temporal logic, legal reasoning, SuhrawardīAbstract
In the present article we explore the possibilities of applying Shihāb al-Dīn Suhrawardī's (549/1155 - 587/1191) epistemology of presence outside its own historical and systematic context. Indeed, we are convinced that Suhrawardī's ideas on temporality and modality are not only fruitful for analysing the work of his predecessors, but also offer new avenues for an epistemological understanding of logic – that is, a perspective in which logic is conceived as the theory and method of acquiring knowledge through demonstration. As noted in the conclusion, the approach offers a new deontic logic that can be generalised for ethical and legal contexts beyond Islamic thought.
References
Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S. (1998). The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In I. Gilboa (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK VII), (pp. 43-56). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Adang, C., Fierro, M., Schmidtke, S. (2013). Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba. The life and works of a controversial thinker. Brill.
Chellas, B. F. (1974). Conditional obligation. In S. Stenlünd (Ed.), Logical theory and semantic analysis: Essays dedicated to Stig Kanger on his fiftieth birthday (pp. 23-33). Reidel.
Clerbout, N. (2014a). First-Order Dialogical Games and Tableaux. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43(4), 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9289-z
Clerbout, N. (2014b). Finiteness of plays and the dialogical problem of decidability, IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 1(1), 115-130.
Clerbout, N., McConaughey, Z. (2022). Dialogical Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-dialogical/
Crubellier, M., McConaughey, Z., Marion, M., Rahman, S. (2019). Dialectic, The Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis. History and Philosophy of Logic, 40(3), 207-233.
van Ditmarsch, H., Hoek, W., Kooi, B. (2007). Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, Vol. 337. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4
Felscher, W. (1985). Dialogues, strategies, and intuitionistic provability. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 28(3), 217-254.
Gutas, D. (1994). Pre-Plotinian Philosophy in Arabic (other than Platonism and Aristotelianism) A Review of the Sources. In W. Haase & H. Temporini (Eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Rémischen Welt (II 36.7, pp. 4939-4973). de Gruyter.
Hasnawi, A., Hodges, W. (2016). Arabic logic up to Avicenna. In C. Duthil Novaes & S. Read (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to medieval logic (pp. 44-66). Cambridge University Press.
Ḥazm, I. (1926-1930). Iḥkām fī uṣūl al-Aḥkām (8 vols. in 2). Ah. mad Muh.ammad Shākir (Ed.). Mat.ba at al-Sa āda. ḥ
Ḥazm, I. (1959). Kitāb al-Taqriiıb li-H. add al-Man.tiq wa-l-Mudkhal ilayhi bi-l-alf āz. al- āmmiyya wal- Amthila al-Fiqhiyya. Iḥsāan Abbās (Ed.). Dār Maktabat al-ḥayāat.
Hibri, A. (1978). Deontic logic. A comprehensive appraisal and a new proposal. University Press of America.
Hilpinen, R, McNamara, P. (2013). Deontic logic: A historical survey and introduction. In D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, & L. van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems (pp. 3-136). College Publications.
Hilpinen, R. (1981). Deontic logic: Introductory and systematic readings. Humanities Press.
Hintikka, J. (1971). Some main problems of deontic logic. In Deontic logic: Introductory and systematic readings (pp. 59-104). Springer Netherlands.
Hourani G.F. (1985). Reason and tradition in Islamic ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Jadaane, F. L. (1968). L’Influence du stoïcisme sur la pensée musulmane. al-Machreq.
Knuuttila, S. (1981). The emergence of deontic logic in the fourteenth century. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic (pp. 225-248). Reidel.
Knuuttila, S. (1993). Modalities in medieval philosophy. Routledge.
Krabbe E. C. W. (1985). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese, 63(3), 295-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485598
Kripke, S. (1980). Meaning and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
Lameer, J. (1994). Al-Farabı and Aristotelian syllogistics: Greek theory and Islamic practice. Brill.
Lameer, J. (2013). Ibn Ḥazm’s logical pedigree. In Adang, C., Fierro, M., Schmidtke, S. (2013), Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba. The life and works of a controversial thinker (pp. 417-428). Brill.
Leibniz, G. W. (1671-Repr. 1930). Elementa juris naturalis. In Sàmtliche Schriften und Briefe. Sechste Reihe: Philosophische Schriften (Bd. 1, pp. 43-485). Otto ReichlVerlag.
Leibniz, G.W. (1968). De Incerti Aestimatione. Memorandum dated September 1678. Ed. K.-R. Biermann and M. Faak (1957).
Lorenz, K., Mittelstrass, J. (1967). On rational philosophy of language: The programme in Plato's cratylus reconsidered. Mind, 76(301), 1-20.
Lorenzen, P. (1958). Logik und Agon. In Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia 4, Florence (pp. 187-194). Sansoni Editore.
Malink, M. (2013). Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic. Harvard University Press.
Marion, M., Rückert, H. (2016). Aristotle on universal quantification: a study from the perspective of game semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic, 37, 201-229.
Martin-Löf, P. (1984). Intuitionistic type theory. Notes by Giovanni Sambin of a series of lectures given in Padua, June 1980. Bibliopolis.
Martin-Löf, P. (2017). Assertion and request. This is a transcript of a lecture given by Per Martin- Löf at the meeting Critical Views of Logic at the University of Oslo on 29 August 2017. Online: PML-Stockholm14Aug17.pdf (cas.cz)
McConaughey, Z. (2021). Aristotle, Science and the Dialectician's Activity. A Dialogical Approach to Aristotle's Logic. PhD-Université de Lille.
Prior, A. N. (1958). Escapism: The logical basis of ethics. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 135-146). University of Washington Press.
Rahman, S., Seck, A. (2024). Suhrawardī’s Stance on Modalities and his Logic of Presence. In A. Ahmed, R. Strobino & M. S. Zarepour (Eds.), Logic, Soul, and World: Essays in Arabic Philosophy in Honor of Tony Street. Brill, in print. Based on the talk under the same title at the Conference on Arabic Logic in honour of Tony Street (U. Cambridge), University of Berkeley, 23-24 April 2022.
Rahman, S., Granström, J. G., Farjami, A. (2019a). Legal reasoning and some logic after all. The lessons of the elders. In D. Gabbay, L. Magnani, W. Park, and A.-V. Pietarinen, Natural arguments. A tribute to John Woods (pp. 743-780). College Publications.
Rahman, S., McConaughey, Z., Klev, A., Clerbout, N. (2018). Immanent Reasoning or Equality in Action: A Plaidoyer for the Play Level (Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning Series, Vol. 18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91149-6
Rahman, S., Zidani, F., Young, W. E. (2018). Ibn Ḥazm on Heteronomous Imperatives. A Landmark in the History of the Logical Analysis of Legal Norms, in Festschrift for Risto Hilpinen, M. Brown, A. Jones, and P. McNamara. Springer.
Suhrawardī, S. D. (1999). The Philosophy of Illumination: A New Critical Edition of the Text of Ḥikmat al-ishrāq with English Translation, Notes, Commentary, and Introduction. Eds. John Walbridge & Hossein Ziai. Brigham young University Press.
Sundholm, G. (1989). Constructive generalized quantifiers. Synthese, 79, 1-12.
Van den Bergh, S. (1954). Averroes’ Tahafut Al-Tahafut. CUP.
Van Ess, J. (1966). Die Erkenntnislehre des Adudaddin al-Icı. Steiner Verlag.
Von Wright, G. H. (1951). An Essay in Modal Logic. North Holland.
Von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action. Kegan Paul.
Von Wright, G. H. (1981). On the logic of norms and actions. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics (pp. 3-34). Reidel.
Von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic Logic. Mind, 60(237), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LX.237.1
Young, W. E. (2017). The dialectical forge: Juridical disputation and the evolution of Islamic law. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).