Intuitions and Ecological Rationality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss24pp145-162Keywords:
intuition, intuitive decision-making, ecological rationality, experiential knowledge, structure recognitionAbstract
Through an ecological approach, it can be said that a person tries to identify the optimal action for him- or herself by a set of different possible actions through intuition. The debate about the ‘dual process theories’ takes up this idea and postulates two different ways to evaluate decision possibilities: A logical-analytical path and an intuitive (Magrabi and Bach, 2013). Predominantly, it is assumed that the logical-analytical path is related to rationality and therefore the path to strive for in rational decision-making. However, in science it has been shown that bounded rationality is to be assumed. Therefore, the question of the extent to which emotions or feelings, and in this context also intuitions, are rational has come to the fore (De Sousa, 1987; Evans and Cruse, 2004).
In this paper, intuitions are considered as a feeling with intentionality: Intuitions always refer to an appropriate environment and are directed toward a decision that results in an action. With Damásio (1994, 2013) it can be shown that an intuition is a feeling that excels in acting as a cue or signal. With the assumption of an ecological rationality (Gigerenzer, Todd and ABC Research Group, 1999; Todd and Gigerenzer, 2012; Todd and Brighton, 2016), it can be shown that intuitive decisions are based on experiential knowledge and implicit structure recognition (Magrabi and Bach, 2013). Accordingly, with the approach of an ecological rationality it can be shown that an intuitive decision is rational in the sense that a person interacts quickly and energy-efficiently successfully adapted with his or her environment and thereby identifies the individual optimal action for him- or herself. This may then be recognized as a "gut feeling" or "intuition". Two challenges will be outlined explained in this paper: The influence of a negative environment on intuitive decisions, and the confusion of an intuition with an emotion or other feeling.
Downloads
References
Berne, E. (2005). Transaktionsanalyse der Intuition. Ein Beitrag der Ich-Psychologie. Junfermann.
Brandes, R., Lang, F., & Schmidt, R. F. (2019). Physiologie des Menschen. Mit Pathophysiologie. Springer.
Budnik, C. (2016). Überlegen und Entscheiden. In M. Kühler, M. Rüther (Eds.), Handbuch Handlungstheorie (pp. 169-176). Metzler. https://doi.org/10.3790/zhf.45.2.217
Damásio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Irrtum. Fühlen, Denken und das menschliche Gehirn (pp. 227-297). List.
Damásio, A. R. (2013). Das Leuchten der Neuronen. Innenleben. Ein Heft über Gefühle, III. https://www.kulturaustausch.de/de/archiv?tx_amkulturaustausch_pi1%5Bauid%5D=2045&tx_amkulturaustausch_pi1%5Bview%5D=ARTICLE&cHash=26a8a2c1357ec184fc979f6e1a22ede0
De Sousa, R. (1987). The Rationality of Emotion. The MIT Press.
Ekman, P. (1988). Gesichtsausdruck und Gefühl. 20 Jahre Forschung von Paul Ekman. Junfermann.
Engelen, E.-M. (2010). Emotion und Intuition. Zwei ungleiche Geschwister. In R. Rosenzweig (Ed.), Geistesblitz und Neuronendonner. Intuition, Kreativität und Phantasie (pp. 121-137). Mentis.
Evans, D. & Cruse, P. (2004). Emotion, Evolution, and Rationality. Oxford University Press.
Fenkart, P. S. (2018). Chefsache Intuition. Besser managen, beurteilen und entscheiden durch intuitive Kompetenz. Springer.
Gallagher, S. (2013). A pattern theory of self. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7(443), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00443
Gigerenzer, G, Todd, R., & ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut Feelings. The intelligence of the unconscious. Viking Penguin.
Gigerenzer, G. (2018). Rationales Entscheiden unter Ungewissheit ≠ Rationales Entscheiden unter Risiko. In B. Fleischer, R. Lauterbach & K. Pawlik (Eds.), Rationale Entscheidungen unter Unsicherheit (pp. 1-14). De Gruyter.
Hardy, J. (2008). Entscheidung. In P. Prechtl, F.-P. Borkard, Metzler Lexikon Philosophie. Begriffe und Definitionen. Metzler.
Huth, A. G., Lee, T., Nishimoto, S., Bilenko, N. Y., Vu, A. T., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Decoding the Semantic Content of Natural Movies from Human Brain Activity. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 10, 81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00081
Inzlicht, M. & Kang, S. K. (2010). Stereotype threat spillover: How coping with threats to social identity affects aggression, eating, decision making, and attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018951
Kobusch, T. (1976). Intuitionen. In J. Ritter & J., K. Gründer (Eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (vol. 4, pp. 524-540). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Kuhnle, C. (2011). The benefit of intuition in learning situations. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of Intuition Research (pp. 227-236). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936370.00030
Langkau, J. (2019). Intuitionen. In M. Grajner & G. Melchior (Eds.), Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie (pp. 152-158). Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04632-1_20
Leyh, A. (2011). Der Frontallappen. In A. Leyh (Ed.), dasGehirn.info. https://www.dasgehirn.info/grundlagen/anatomie/der-frontallappen
Magrabi, A. & Bach, J. (2013). Entscheidungsfindung. In A. Stephan & S. Walter (Eds.), Handbuch Kognitionswissenschaften (pp. 274-289). Metzler.
Newen, A. & Welpinghus, A., Juckel, G. (2015). Emotion Recognition as Pattern Recognition: The Relevance of Perception. Mind & Language, 30(2), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12077
Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., Naselaris, T., Benjamini, Y., Yu, B., & Gallant, J. L. (2011). Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology, 21(19), 1641-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031
Osterath, B. (2018). Bewusste Gefühle. In A. Leyh (Ed.), dasGehirn.info. https://www.dasgehirn.info/denken/emotion/bewusste-gefuehle
Prinz, J. (2005). Are emotions feelings? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12, 9-25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233685028_Are_Emotions_Feelings
Pust, J. (2017). Intuition. In Zalta, E. N., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/intui-tion/
Robins, S. (2017). Memory Traces. In S. Bernecker, K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory (pp. 76-87). Routledge.
Tonegawa, S., Liu, X., Ramirez, S., & Redondo, R. (2015). Perspective. Memory Engram Cells Have Come of Age. Neuron, 87(5), 918-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.002
Todd, P. M. & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). What is ecological rationality. In P. M., Todd & G. Gigerenzer, The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Ecological Rationality. Intelligence in the World (pp. 3-30). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315448.003.0011
Todd, P. M. & Brighton, H. (2016). Building the Theory of Ecological Rationality. Minds & Machines 26, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9371-0
Werning, M. (2020). Predicting the Past from Minimal Traces: Episodic Memory and its Distinction from Imagination and Preservation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11, 301-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00471-z
Wöhler, K. (1972). Entscheidungstheorie. In J. Ritter, K. Gründer (Eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (vol. 2, pp. 544-547). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Zinck, A. & Newen, A. (2008). Classifying Emotions: A Developmental Account. Synthese, 161(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9149-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).