La Dialogique de la présence de Suhrawardī et les modalités déontiques dans et au-delà de la pensée Islamique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2024iss25pp149-191Palabras clave:
impératives hétéronomes, logique déontique, logique dialogique, logique temporelle, raisonnement juridique, SuhrawardīResumen
Dans le présent article, nous explorons les possibilités d'appliquer l'épistémologie de la présence de Shihāb al-Dīn Suhrawardī (549/1155 - 587/1191) en dehors de son propre contexte historique et systématique. En effet, nous sommes convaincus que les idées de Suhrawardī sur la temporalité et la modalité ne sont pas seulement fructueuses pour une analyse du travail de ses prédécesseurs, mais qu'elles offrent également de nouvelles voies pour une compréhension épistémologique de la logique – c'est-à-dire une perspective dans laquelle la logique est conçue comme la théorie et la méthode d'acquisition de la connaissance par démonstration. Comme mentionné dans la conclusion, l'approche offre une nouvelle logique déontique qui peut être généralisée pour des contextes éthiques et juridiques au-delà de la pensée islamique.
Mots-clés: impératives hétéronomes, logique déontique, logique dialogique, logique temporelle, raisonnement juridique, Suhrawardī.
Descargas
Citas
Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S. (1998). The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In I. Gilboa (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK VII), (pp. 43-56). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Adang, C., Fierro, M., Schmidtke, S. (2013). Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba. The life and works of a controversial thinker. Brill.
Chellas, B. F. (1974). Conditional obligation. In S. Stenlünd (Ed.), Logical theory and semantic analysis: Essays dedicated to Stig Kanger on his fiftieth birthday (pp. 23-33). Reidel.
Clerbout, N. (2014a). First-Order Dialogical Games and Tableaux. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43(4), 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9289-z
Clerbout, N. (2014b). Finiteness of plays and the dialogical problem of decidability, IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 1(1), 115-130.
Clerbout, N., McConaughey, Z. (2022). Dialogical Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-dialogical/
Crubellier, M., McConaughey, Z., Marion, M., Rahman, S. (2019). Dialectic, The Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis. History and Philosophy of Logic, 40(3), 207-233.
van Ditmarsch, H., Hoek, W., Kooi, B. (2007). Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, Vol. 337. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4
Felscher, W. (1985). Dialogues, strategies, and intuitionistic provability. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 28(3), 217-254.
Gutas, D. (1994). Pre-Plotinian Philosophy in Arabic (other than Platonism and Aristotelianism) A Review of the Sources. In W. Haase & H. Temporini (Eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Rémischen Welt (II 36.7, pp. 4939-4973). de Gruyter.
Hasnawi, A., Hodges, W. (2016). Arabic logic up to Avicenna. In C. Duthil Novaes & S. Read (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to medieval logic (pp. 44-66). Cambridge University Press.
Ḥazm, I. (1926-1930). Iḥkām fī uṣūl al-Aḥkām (8 vols. in 2). Ah. mad Muh.ammad Shākir (Ed.). Mat.ba at al-Sa āda. ḥ
Ḥazm, I. (1959). Kitāb al-Taqriiıb li-H. add al-Man.tiq wa-l-Mudkhal ilayhi bi-l-alf āz. al- āmmiyya wal- Amthila al-Fiqhiyya. Iḥsāan Abbās (Ed.). Dār Maktabat al-ḥayāat.
Hibri, A. (1978). Deontic logic. A comprehensive appraisal and a new proposal. University Press of America.
Hilpinen, R, McNamara, P. (2013). Deontic logic: A historical survey and introduction. In D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, & L. van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems (pp. 3-136). College Publications.
Hilpinen, R. (1981). Deontic logic: Introductory and systematic readings. Humanities Press.
Hintikka, J. (1971). Some main problems of deontic logic. In Deontic logic: Introductory and systematic readings (pp. 59-104). Springer Netherlands.
Hourani G.F. (1985). Reason and tradition in Islamic ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Jadaane, F. L. (1968). L’Influence du stoïcisme sur la pensée musulmane. al-Machreq.
Knuuttila, S. (1981). The emergence of deontic logic in the fourteenth century. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic (pp. 225-248). Reidel.
Knuuttila, S. (1993). Modalities in medieval philosophy. Routledge.
Krabbe E. C. W. (1985). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese, 63(3), 295-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485598
Kripke, S. (1980). Meaning and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
Lameer, J. (1994). Al-Farabı and Aristotelian syllogistics: Greek theory and Islamic practice. Brill.
Lameer, J. (2013). Ibn Ḥazm’s logical pedigree. In Adang, C., Fierro, M., Schmidtke, S. (2013), Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba. The life and works of a controversial thinker (pp. 417-428). Brill.
Leibniz, G. W. (1671-Repr. 1930). Elementa juris naturalis. In Sàmtliche Schriften und Briefe. Sechste Reihe: Philosophische Schriften (Bd. 1, pp. 43-485). Otto ReichlVerlag.
Leibniz, G.W. (1968). De Incerti Aestimatione. Memorandum dated September 1678. Ed. K.-R. Biermann and M. Faak (1957).
Lorenz, K., Mittelstrass, J. (1967). On rational philosophy of language: The programme in Plato's cratylus reconsidered. Mind, 76(301), 1-20.
Lorenzen, P. (1958). Logik und Agon. In Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia 4, Florence (pp. 187-194). Sansoni Editore.
Malink, M. (2013). Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic. Harvard University Press.
Marion, M., Rückert, H. (2016). Aristotle on universal quantification: a study from the perspective of game semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic, 37, 201-229.
Martin-Löf, P. (1984). Intuitionistic type theory. Notes by Giovanni Sambin of a series of lectures given in Padua, June 1980. Bibliopolis.
Martin-Löf, P. (2017). Assertion and request. This is a transcript of a lecture given by Per Martin- Löf at the meeting Critical Views of Logic at the University of Oslo on 29 August 2017. Online: PML-Stockholm14Aug17.pdf (cas.cz)
McConaughey, Z. (2021). Aristotle, Science and the Dialectician's Activity. A Dialogical Approach to Aristotle's Logic. PhD-Université de Lille.
Prior, A. N. (1958). Escapism: The logical basis of ethics. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 135-146). University of Washington Press.
Rahman, S., Seck, A. (2024). Suhrawardī’s Stance on Modalities and his Logic of Presence. In A. Ahmed, R. Strobino & M. S. Zarepour (Eds.), Logic, Soul, and World: Essays in Arabic Philosophy in Honor of Tony Street. Brill, in print. Based on the talk under the same title at the Conference on Arabic Logic in honour of Tony Street (U. Cambridge), University of Berkeley, 23-24 April 2022.
Rahman, S., Granström, J. G., Farjami, A. (2019a). Legal reasoning and some logic after all. The lessons of the elders. In D. Gabbay, L. Magnani, W. Park, and A.-V. Pietarinen, Natural arguments. A tribute to John Woods (pp. 743-780). College Publications.
Rahman, S., McConaughey, Z., Klev, A., Clerbout, N. (2018). Immanent Reasoning or Equality in Action: A Plaidoyer for the Play Level (Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning Series, Vol. 18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91149-6
Rahman, S., Zidani, F., Young, W. E. (2018). Ibn Ḥazm on Heteronomous Imperatives. A Landmark in the History of the Logical Analysis of Legal Norms, in Festschrift for Risto Hilpinen, M. Brown, A. Jones, and P. McNamara. Springer.
Suhrawardī, S. D. (1999). The Philosophy of Illumination: A New Critical Edition of the Text of Ḥikmat al-ishrāq with English Translation, Notes, Commentary, and Introduction. Eds. John Walbridge & Hossein Ziai. Brigham young University Press.
Sundholm, G. (1989). Constructive generalized quantifiers. Synthese, 79, 1-12.
Van den Bergh, S. (1954). Averroes’ Tahafut Al-Tahafut. CUP.
Van Ess, J. (1966). Die Erkenntnislehre des Adudaddin al-Icı. Steiner Verlag.
Von Wright, G. H. (1951). An Essay in Modal Logic. North Holland.
Von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action. Kegan Paul.
Von Wright, G. H. (1981). On the logic of norms and actions. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics (pp. 3-34). Reidel.
Von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic Logic. Mind, 60(237), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LX.237.1
Young, W. E. (2017). The dialectical forge: Juridical disputation and the evolution of Islamic law. Springer.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).




