A defence of the conceptualist solution to the “grounding problem” for coincident objects
Abstract
I consider some of the objections that have been raised against a conceptualist solution to the “grounding problem” (the problem of grounding the sortalish properties of material objects in their non-sortalish ones), I address in particular two objections that I call Conceptual Validity and Instantiation, and I attempt to answer them on behalf of the conceptualist. My response, in a nutshell, is that the first of these objections fails because it ascribes to the conceptualist some commitments that do not really follow from the view’s basic insight, while the second objection also fails because (among other things) it (inadvertently) denies the conceptualist resources that the alternative positions are allowed to use.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Español (España))References
Barker, S. y Jago, M. (2017). Material Objects and Essential Bundle Theory. Philosophical Studies, 175, 2969-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0990-6).
Bennett, K. (2004). Spatio-temporal Coincidence and the Grounding Problem. Philosophical Studies, 118, 339-371. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000026471.20355.54
Black, M. (1952). The Identity of Indiscernibles. Mind, 61, 153-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXI.242.153
Einheuser, I. (2011). Toward a Conceptualist Solution to the Grounding Problem. Noûs, 45, 300-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00765.x
Fine, K. (2003). The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter. Mind, 112, 195-234. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/112.446.195
Jago, M. (2016). Essence and the Grounding Problem. En M. Jago (ed.), Reality Making, pp. 99-120. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755722.003.0006
Korman, D. (2015). Objects. Nothing out of the Ordinary, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732532.001.0001
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2006). How not to Trivialise the Identity of Indiscernibles. En P. Strawson y A. Chakrabarti (eds.), Concepts, Properties and Qualities, pp. 205-23. Londres: Ashgate.
Saenz, N. (2015). A Grounding Solution to the Grounding Problem. Philosophical Studies, 172, 2193-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0405-x
Schaffer, J. (2001). The Individuation of Tropes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, 247-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/713659225
Sutton, C. (2012). Coincident Objects, Tally Ho: A Solution to the Grounding Problem. Mind, 121, 703-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzs078
Thomasson, A. (2007) Ordinary Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195319910.001.0001
van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501713033
Zerbudis, E. (2018). El conservadurismo realista acerca de la composición de Daniel Korman. Cuadernos de Filosofía, 36, 33-53 (http://revistasacademicas.udec.cl/index.php/cuadernos_de_filosofia/article/view/825).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2020iss16pp41-60
Copyright (c) 2021 Humanities Journal of Valparaíso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.