Interactive Hypotheses: Towards a Dialogical Foundation of Surrogate Reasoning

Juan Redmond; Rodrigo Lopez-Orellana

doi:10.22370/rhv2023iss22pp105-130

Autores/as

Juan Redmond Universidad de Valparaíso https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-9490
Rodrigo Lopez-Orellana Universidad de Valparaíso https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-0136

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2023iss22pp105-130

Palabras clave:

hipótesis, interacción, modelización científica, diálogo, razonamiento sustitutivo

Resumen

El objetivo de este artículo es proponer una justificación lógica del proceso de razonamiento sustitutivo en la práctica del modelado en ciencia. Para ello, definimos la generación de hipótesis como la creación de un diálogo interactivo y formal entre el modelo y el sistema objetivo. Para describir esta idea desde un punto de vista lógico, nos basaremos en el enfoque pragmático de la Dialógica como marco ideal para ilustrar las interacciones lógicas.

Citas

Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive reasoning. Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation. Springer.

Aristotle. (2014). Premiers Analytiques, Organon III. Traduction, introduction, notes, commentaire et bibliographie par Michel Crubellier. Flammarion.

Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., & Sneed, J. D. (1987). An Architectonic for Science. The Structuralist Program. Synthese Library, Vol. 186. Springer Netherlands.

Barés Gómez, C., & Fontaine, M. (2017). Argumentation and Abduction in Dialogical Logic. In L. Magnani and T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Handbook of model-based science (pp. 295-314). Springer.

Clerbout, N., & McConaughey, Z. (2022). Dialogical logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Ed). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/logic-dialogical/

Clerbout, N. (2013a). Etude sur quelques sémantiques dialogiques. Concepts fondamentaux et éléments de metathéorie. PHD thesis. Universities of Lille 3 and Leiden.

Clerbout, N. (2013b). First-order dialogical games and tableaux. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43, 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9289-z

Clerbout, N., Gorisse, M-H., & Rahman, S. (2011). Context-sensitivity in jain philosophy. A dialogical study of Siddharsigani’s commentary on the handbook of logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40(5), 633-662.

Contessa, G. (2007). Scientific representation, interpretation, and surrogative reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 74(1), 48-68.

Díez, J. A., & Moulines, C. U. (2016). Fundamentos de filosofía de la ciencia. Editorial Ariel.

Dummett, M. (1977). Elements of Intuitionism. Oxford University Press.

Felscher, W. (1985). Dialogues as a foundation for intuitionistic logic. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic, Vol. 3 (pp. 341-372). Kluwer.

Felscher, W. (1994). Review of Jean E. Rubin’s mathematical logic: applications and theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 59, 670-671.

Fine, A. (1993). Fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00254.x

Fiutek, V., Rückert, H., & Rahman, S. (2010). A dialogical semantics for Bonanno’s system of belief revision. In P. Bour et al. (Eds.), Constructions (pp. 315-334). College Publications.

Frigg, R., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Models and representation. In L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Handbook of model-based science (pp. 49-102). Springer.

Gabbay, D., & Woods, J. (2006). Advice on abductive logic. Log. J. IGPL, 14(2), 189-219.

Giere, R. (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press.

Lewis, D. (1978). Truth in Fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly. 15(1), 37-46.

Lopez-Orellana, R. (2020). Sobre la modelización y la comprensión científicas. Un enfoque inferencial y dinámico aplicado al modelo evo-devo Polypterus de la plasticidad fenotípica. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Salamanca.

Lopez-Orellana, R., Redmond, J., & Cortés-García, D. (2019). Un enfoque inferencial y dinámico de la modelización y de la comprensión en biología. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, (14), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2019iss14pp315-334

Lorenz, K. (2001). Basic objectives of dialogical logic in historical perspective. Synthese, 127, 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216790.33

Lorenz, K. (2008). Dialogischer Konstruktivismus. De Gruyter.

Lorenz, K. (2010a). Philosophische Variationen: Gesammelte Aufsatze Unter Einschluss Gemeinsam Mit Jurgen Mittelstrass Geschriebener Arbeiten Zu Platon Und Leibniz. De Gruyter.

Lorenz, K. (2010b). Logic, language and method - On polarities in human experience. De Gruyter.

Lorenzen P. & Lorenz, K. (1978). Dialogische Logik. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Lorenzen, P. (1960). Logik und Agon. In Atti del XII Congresso Internationale de Filosofia (Venezia): Logica, linguaggio e comunicazione Vol. 4 (pp. 187-194). Sansoni Editore.

Magnier, S. (2013). Approche dialogique de la dynamique épistémique et de la condition juridique. College Publications.

Marion, M., & Rückert, H. (2015). Aristotle on universal quantification: A study form the perspective of game semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic, 37(3), 201-229.

Martin-Löf, P. (1984). Intuitionistic Type Theory. Notes by Giovanni Sambin of a Series of Lectures given in Padua, June 1980. Bibliopolis.

Martin-Löf, P. (1996.) On the Meanings of the Logical Constants and the Justifications of the Logical Laws. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1(1), 11-60.

Olsson E. J., & Enqvist, S. (2011). Editor’s Introduction. In Erik J. O. & S. Enqvist (Eds.), Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science. Series Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science Vol. 21. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9609-8

Plato (1952). Laches. Protagoras. Meno. Euthydemus. Translated by W. R. M. Lamb. Loeb Classical Library IV. Harvard University Press.

Popek, A. (2012). Logical dialogues from middle ages. In C. Barés et al. (Eds.), Logic of knowledge. Theory and applications (pp. 223-244). College Publications.

Rahman, S., & Keiff, L. (2005). On how to be a dialogician. In D. Vanderveken (Ed.), Logic, thought and action (pp. 359-408). Kluwer.

Rahman, S., & Keiff, L. (2010). La dialectique entre logique et rhétorique. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 66(2), 149-178.

Rahman, S. (1993). Über Dialogue, Protologische Kategorien und andere Seltenheiten. P. Lang.

Rahman, S., Clerbout, N., & Keiff, L. (2009). On dialogues and natural deduction. In G. Primiero & S. Rahman (Eds.), Acts of knowledge: history, philosophy and logic. Essays dedicated to Göran Sundholm (pp. 301-336). College Publications.

Rahman, S., McConaughey, Z., Klev, A., & Clerbout, N. (2018). Immanent Reasoning or Equality in Action. A Plaidoyer for the Play Level. Series Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning Vol. 18. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91149-6

Redmond, J. (2020). Imagination et révision de croyances. In Jean-Yves Beziau & Daniel Schulthess (Eds.), L’Imagination. Actes du 37e Congrès de l’ASPLF (Rio de Janeiro, 26-31 mars 2018) (vol. 1, 109-118). College Publications and Academia Brasileira de Filosofia.

Redmond, J. (2021a). A free dialogical logic for surrogate reasoning: generation of hypothesis without ontological commitments. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 36(3), 297-320. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.21902

Redmond, J. (2021c). Representation and surrogate reasoning: A Proposal from Dialogical Pragmatism. In A. Cassini & J. Redmond (Eds.). Models and idealizations in science. Artifactual and fictional approaches. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65802-1

Redmond, J., Lopez-Orellana, R., & Paniagua, L. (2021b). Punto de vista lógico y no representacionista del razonamiento sustitutivo. Cuadernos Filosóficos, Segunda Época, (18), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.35305/cf2.vi18.147

Ross, W. D. (Ed.) (1957). Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Clarendon Press.

Rückert, H. (2011). Dialogues as a dynamic framework for logic. College Publications.

Stegmüller, W. (1970). Theorie und Erfahrung (Vol. 2). Springer-Verlag.

Stegmüller, W. (1973). Theorienstrukturen und Theorien- Dynamik. Zweiter Halbband Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik (Vol. 2/2). Springer-Verlag.

Suárez, M. (2004). An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 767-779.

Suppe, F. (1989). The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. University of Illinois Press.

Suppes, P. (1960). A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences. Synthese, 12(2/3), 287-301.

Suppes, P. (1970). Set-Theoretical Structures in Science. Stanford University Press.

Swoyer, C. (1991). Structural representation and surrogative reasoning. Synthese, 87(3), 449-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499820

Tarski, A. (1983). Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Hackett.

Vaihinger, H. (1927). Die Philosophie des Als Ob. (10a edition). Felix Meiner. [1a ed. 1911]. [Trad. C. K. Odgen, The Philosophy of ‘As if’. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1925].

Van Benthem, J. (1991). General Dynamics. Theoretical Linguistics, 17(1-3), 159-202.

Woods, J. (1974). The Logic of Fiction: A Philosophical Sounding of Deviant Logic. Mouton.