Nomological Dispositionalism and Its Problems: Redundancy, Experimentalism, and Nomic Modality




laws, dispositional propierties, modality, experimentalism, meta-metaphysics


Nomological dispositionalism has occupied a center stage in contemporary metaphysics about laws, holding the view that laws of nature derive from an ontology of intrinsically modal dispositional properties. This view faces, though, various challenges, some of which are worth revisiting. Among them, dispositionalism about properties condemns laws to ontological redundancy; its reconstruction of properties does not seem to fit with experimentalism; it introduces a view of metaphysical modality that ambiguously moves between (de dicto) logical modality and (de re) physical modality; and it assumes fundamentalist meta-metaphysical presuppositions. Rather than dismantling nomological dispositionalism –quite the contrary, we believe it is a valuable theory–, we aim at identifying those nodes where alternative strategies could be followed in a theory of laws.

Author Biography

Cristian Soto, Universidad de Chile

Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Chile


Alvarado, José Tomas. (2007). Mundos Posibles como Universales Estructurales Máximos. Una Conjetura Filosófica. Análisis Filosófico, XXVII(2), 119-143.

Alvarado, José Tomás. (2020). A Metaphysics for Platonic Universals and Their Instantiations: Shadows of Universals. Dordrecht: Springer.

Arabatzis, Theodor. (2006). Representing Electrons: A Biographical Approach to Theoretical Entities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Armstrong, David. (1983). What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berenstain, Nora and James Ladyman. (2012). Ontic Structural Realism and Modality. En Landry, E. M., Rickles, D. P. (Eds.), Structural Realism: Structure, Object, and Causality, pp. 149- 168. Dordrecht: Springer.

Bigelow, John, Brian Ellis y Caroline Lierse. (1992). The World as One of a Kind: Natural Necessity and Laws of Nature. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 43(3), 371-388.

Bird, Alexander. (2007). Nature’s Metaphysics. Laws ad Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cartwright, Nancy. (1989). Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cartwright, Nancy. (2019). Nature, the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World, and How We Can Arrange It Better. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.

Darrigol, Olivier. (2014). Physics and Necessity: Rationalist Pursuits from the Cartesian Past to the Quantum Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harré, R., Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., Collier, J. (2007). Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lange, Marc. (2000). Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lange, Marc. (2009). Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, David. (1986). Philosophical Papers, Volume II. New York: Oxford University Press.

Maudlin, Tim. (2007). The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maudlin, Tim. (2020). A Modal Free Lunch. Foundations of Physics, 50(6), 522-529.

Mitchell, Sandra. (2009). Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Molnar, George. (2003). Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mumford, Stephen. (1998). Dispositions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mumford, Stephen. (2004). Laws in Nature. London and New York, Routledge.

Mumford, S., Anjum, R. L. (2011). Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Walter, O. (2009). Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ott, Walter. (2022). The Metaphysics of Laws of Nature: The Rules of the Game. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shoemaker, Sydney (1980). Causality and Properties. En van Inwagen, P. (Ed.), Cause and Time: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, pp. 109-136. Dordrecht: Springer.

Soto, C. (2015). The Current State of the Metaphysics of Science Debate. Philosophica, 90, 23-60.

Soto, C. (2017). Globally and Locally Applied Naturalistic Metaphysics. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 40(3), 33-50.

Soto, C. (2021). Humeanismo y Leyes de la Naturaleza: Alcance y Límites. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, 17, 145-167.ículos

Soto, C. (2023, por aparecer). Descartes y la Emergencia de las Leyes de la Naturaleza: Una Carta de Viaje para el Debate Actual. Disputatio: Boletín de Investigación Filosófica.

Soto, C., Bueno, O. (2019). A Framework for an Inferential Conception of Physical Laws. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 23(3), 423-444.

Soto, C., Rodríguez, P. (2019). Capacidades y Leyes Fenomenológicas: el Disposicionalismo Experimental. Revista de Filosofía, 76, 185-201.

Swartz, Norman. (2003). The Concept of Physical Law. Barnaby, British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.

Swoyer, C. (1982). The Nature of Natural Laws. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 60(3), 202-223.

Vetter, Barbara. (2015). Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.



2022-12-01 — Updated on 2022-12-02

How to Cite

Soto, C. (2022). Nomological Dispositionalism and Its Problems: Redundancy, Experimentalism, and Nomic Modality. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (20), 251–270.




Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.